Diagnostic
What three seconds costs, in your own numbers.
Four numbers you already know, run against three published speed studies, to produce a rounded monthly range. It is arithmetic on what you type, not a measurement of your site.
The curve
Everything below comes off these two lines.
Two published findings on one time axis. The calculator reads the same five points and does nothing else with them.
Your numbers
Slow-Site Cost Calculator
Set the four values, then read the rounded monthly range. Directional math, not a promise: the audit gets specific.
What this measures
Four inputs, three studies, one range.
Your monthly visitors, your current mobile load time, what a new customer is worth to you, and your current conversion rate. The load time picks a point on the curve above. The visitor figure is your traffic against the abandonment upper bound, the revenue figure is your current conversions against the recovery multiple and your customer value, and both are rounded before they are shown.
The payback line divides the first package price by the estimated monthly revenue, which is why it moves whenever the package price moves. If you pick Not sure for conversion rate, it uses a 1% to 3% planning range and says so, because that one number is an assumption rather than a cited benchmark.
Known limits
What this arithmetic cannot know.
- It has not looked at your site. Every figure comes from the four numbers you typed. Change the customer value and the answer changes with it.
- The research behind it is aggregate. Portent's ratio came from a large mixed sample; your industry, your traffic mix and your price point can sit a long way from that average.
- It cannot tell you that speed is your constraint. If people leave because the page never says what you do or what it costs, a faster page loses them sooner.
- The visitor range has a floor of zero at every load time, on purpose. The honest lower bound for visitors you would have kept is none.
- Payback is a ratio, not a forecast. It assumes the estimated revenue appears and then continues, which no calculator can establish.
Sources
Where the numbers come from.
- 53% of mobile visitors abandon a page that takes longer than 3 seconds to load. Google mobile speed research
- A 0.1 second mobile speed improvement lifted retail conversions by 8.4% in the cited study. Deloitte and Google, Milliseconds Make Millions
- Sites loading in 1 second converted roughly 2.5 to 3 times better than sites loading in 5 seconds. Portent site speed research
Related reading
The 3-Second Problem for Local Business Sites
Where the three second line on the chart comes from, what Google's own research says a slow page costs a local business, and how to tell whether yours is affected.
Read the articleNext step
The audit replaces the guess.
The audit measures your actual pages and says which of these numbers is real for you. It is a person reading the site against what your customers are trying to do.